Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 04:23

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
RPI researchers delighted when underwater volcano opened up beneath them - Times Union
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
How John Cena recreated CM Punk’s Pipe Bomb promo and changed his farewell tour - Cageside Seats
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Humpback Whale Bubble Rings May Be an Attempt to Communicate With Us - ScienceAlert
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Diablo II: Resurrected Ladder Season 11 Coming Soon - Blizzard News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Iron is naturally present in these 10 foods - Times of India